The Boostrapper’s Dilemma: Navigating A Bold Myth


The following is a case study on the venture capital ecosystem and bootstrapping a startup through customer acquisition. In the first section, I’ll describe the importance of venture capital, but explain why it can be destructive if pursued too early. In the second section, I’ll discuss my company’s customer acquisition strategy, even though it came too late for pure self-funding. In the third and final section, I’ll review and connect the first two sections while admitting my faults.

I.

Every culture drags along its share of myths. Myths can be entertaining and even historically fascinating. But, more often than not, they are debilitating. A bold myth exists in startup culture, unique to the early stage business cycle, that says the success of a business is dependent on the injection of investor capital.

Without a doubt, venture capital has been influential, even necessary, to much of the booming success of the technology ecosystem, including the software platforms and hardware infrastructure we use, rely on and take for granted everyday. Venture-backed companies have even produced ‘a little in, a lot out‘ effect on the country’s economy. Here are key statistics for 2006 through 2008:

- Venture-backed companies now account for 12 million jobs and 21% of GDP;

- 81% of the software industry’s 1 million jobs originate from venture-backed startups;

- Venture-backed companies showed 1.6% job growth in the private sector vs. 0.2% in the industry as a whole.

While I can’t deny the importance of venture money, my argument is that startups, mine included, would have a higher success rate, including valuation and profitability, if raising venture capital was eliminated as a first priority in the business cycle. The fund raising process is painful, distracting, and most of all, desperately time consuming.

Looking back on my company’s business strategy, I believe my time would have been better spent attempting to acquire early customers rather than attempting to raise a seed investment, which I eventually did. The goal should be not take outside investment unless you absolutely need to. The process of fund raising has a high opportunity cost, and if timed incorrectly, can potentially ignite the failure of a company.

Established investors bring valuable inputs, including seasoned experience, an established network, credibility and of course, money. But, anyone with even minor business sense will realize what’s missing from the input list: proof of market. Meaning, just because a business has taken capital doesn’t mean they are a money making business.

While I admit my mistake of spending too much time on fund raising and not enough time bootstrapping, I’ve developed research on early stage customer acquisition strategy. While my research is unique to my company, the lessons have industry crossover, especially for consumer facing businesses.

II.

The goal of my company was, and partially still is, to provide analytics insightful enough to help an organization improve their decision making. Because the majority of data we are parsing is from Twitter, the target customer needed to be small enough to be approachable, but dealt with brands, products or names mainstream enough to be talked about on Twitter. Also, by approaching smaller clients, we would have a higher probability of reaching the decision maker.

diagram_1

The hypothetical ideal customer, in my case, lined up with four types of clients: consumer goods, marketing agencies, investment firms and political consultancies. Further research would prove that two of these made sense, and two did not.

The clients we avoided with their respective sales strategies are described below:

- Selling directly to a consumer goods or “brand” company (top)

- Selling to a middle man–a marketing agency–who would then charge their “brand” company (bottom)

diagram_2

The consumer goods companies with high conversation products are difficult to approach and typically bureaucratic. The time dedicated to making a sale, if at all, would be vast because of the approval layers necessary to do business with a startup.

Selling analytics to a marketing firm, while more approachable than consumer goods, was avoided as well. Our major competitors were devouring this space, and from the marketing firms we spoke with, many had proprietary tools that accomplished a similar goal. Our software wasn’t developed enough to beat them at their own game yet.

The clients we did approach with their respective sales strategies are described below:

- Selling to a middle man–a political consultant–who would then charge their clients (top)

- Selling directly to an asset management firm (bottom)

diagram_3

diagram_4

Political consultancies are small enough to approach while dealing with client issues big enough to gather conversation in social media. Our value proposition was to provide analytics regarding a politician or campaign topic with insight that would be otherwise unattainable. There were few competitors in the political space, and our theory is that sentiment data could be used to by a politician to tailor a specific message during a campaign.

We also approached investment firms small enough to reach a decision maker with portfolio companies that were discussed in social media. The value proposition was that investors could use our platform to gauge sentiment about a company they were invested in or considering investing in.

III.

The goal of this case study was to discuss customer acquisition as an alternative to early stage fund raising in direct reference to how I approached my first customers. While the importance of venture capital is necessary to scaling a business in select cases, it’s becoming apparent that it’s less valuable than it used to be, simply because the costs of starting a technology company are decreasing.

While raising an investment round may be on your company’s tentative schedule, I highly recommend focusing on early customer acquisition as a way to bootstrap. Although I didn’t do this, my hindsight research tells me I should have.

  • HackerNews
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Related Essays


Post Tags: , ,

Comments ( View Comments )

Excellent post.

“Our value proposition was to provide analytics regarding a politician or campaign topic with insight that would be otherwise unattainable.”

The 'unattainable' part of this equation seems to be the competitive advantage part, and with an open firehose like Twitter that would either be unparalleled technical prowess or just being really, really clever. Both of these require the ability to rapidly and constantly experiment with the data itself.

jamtoday added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 11:05 am

The advantage is beyond just Twitter data. It's taking data from sources
that are either hard to get or overlooked in combination with social media
sources. Seeking correlations is where things get interesting.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 11:54 am

Great article. Thanks. SImilar to your observation, my own experience is that consumer patterns have changed dramatically in recent years and a new generation of entrepreneurs is now at the best and unique vantage point to visualize what their peers need and want. So this is not about solutions looking for problems or problems looking for solutions. It is about creators of solutions being also the consumers of solutions (“entre-sumers”). There is much less need in gambling lots of money and wait to see “if the dog would eat the dog food”. Entrepreneurs are the “alpha” dogs. We are our own “surrogate” customers which means that we don't need a lot of money to “supersize” our company anymore. As struggling entrepreneurs, I agree with you wholeheartedly that our first directive is very simple which is not to get funding but to acquire customers.

http://www.startupforless.org

dennykmiu added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 1:10 pm

Well put. Nothing to add to that.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 2:55 pm

That is probably the most insightful comment I've ever read on a blog. Nice one Denny.

Thanks for the case study Alex. I appreciate that you've used yourself as an example here.

Justin King added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 5:08 pm

If I used anyone else as an example, I'd be lying. Unfortunately, plenty of
blogs fall into this trap.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 5:14 pm

interesting value prop for politicians and investors–never would have considered them as consumers of social media analytics data. I wouldn't write-off “brand companies” so quickly.

One more thing–how low is your price point? I think that all of your assumptions are correct with the exception of the bureaucracy. From my time at Amex, you're right in that there are a lot of politics when dealing with a start-up. But if your price point is low enough, most employees could probably put it directly on their charge card rather than go through procurement and lawyers.

Matt Daniels added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 7:02 pm

I haven't proven the market for politicians and / or investors. However, for
politics I envision it being valuable for campaign organization, and for
investors I can see it being valuable to certain aspects of market research.

The price point is still variable. We're still floating in a fine line
between consulting and strictly a software model. Forward looking, I'd like
to keep it high because I'd prefer a smaller amount of higher paying
customers as opposed to a high quantity of low paying customers.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 7:31 pm

That is probably the most insightful comment I've ever read on a blog. Nice one Denny.

Thanks for the case study Alex. I appreciate that you've used yourself as an example here.

Justin King added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 8:08 pm

If I used anyone besides myself as an example, I'd be lying, or at least fabricating. Unfortunately, plenty of blogs fall into this trap.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 8:14 pm

interesting value prop for politicians and investors–never would have considered them as consumers of social media analytics data. I wouldn't write-off “brand companies” so quickly.

One more thing–how low is your price point? I think that all of your assumptions are correct with the exception of the bureaucracy. From my time at Amex, you're right in that there are a lot of politics when dealing with a start-up. But if your price point is low enough, most employees could probably put it directly on their charge card rather than go through procurement and lawyers.

Matt Daniels added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 10:02 pm

I haven't proven the market for politicians and / or investors. However, for
politics I envision it being valuable for campaign organization, and for
investors I can see it being valuable to certain aspects of market research.

The price point is still variable. We're still floating in a fine line
between consulting and strictly a software model. Forward looking, I'd like
to keep it high because I'd prefer a smaller amount of higher paying
customers as opposed to a high quantity of low paying customers.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 10:31 pm

Well put. Nothing to add to that.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 01 09 at 10:55 pm

That is probably the most insightful comment I've ever read on a blog. Nice one Denny.

Thanks for the case study Alex. I appreciate that you've used yourself as an example here.

Justin King added these pithy words on Dec 02 09 at 1:08 am

If I used anyone besides myself as an example, I'd be lying, or at least fabricating. Unfortunately, plenty of blogs fall into this trap.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 02 09 at 1:14 am

interesting value prop for politicians and investors–never would have considered them as consumers of social media analytics data. I wouldn't write-off “brand companies” so quickly.

One more thing–how low is your price point? I think that all of your assumptions are correct with the exception of the bureaucracy. From my time at Amex, you're right in that there are a lot of politics when dealing with a start-up. But if your price point is low enough, most employees could probably put it directly on their charge card rather than go through procurement and lawyers.

Matt Daniels added these pithy words on Dec 02 09 at 3:02 am

I haven't proven the market for politicians and / or investors. However, for
politics I envision it being valuable for campaign organization, and for
investors I can see it being valuable to certain aspects of market research.

The price point is still variable. We're still floating in a fine line
between consulting and strictly a software model. Forward looking, I'd like
to keep it high because I'd prefer a smaller amount of higher paying
customers as opposed to a high quantity of low paying customers.

alexjmann added these pithy words on Dec 02 09 at 3:31 am

Add a Comment


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

blog comments powered by Disqus