Verbal Hedging
I delivered a practice round of an investor pitch to one of my mentors yesterday, who is a successful Angel investor and serial entrepreneur. The reason I practiced it was to specify any ambiguous language, tighten any unclear concepts and to make sure the general flow of the presentation moved smoothly, but also at a fair pace. On Friday, I have my first “real” pitch with an association of seed investors where I won’t have the luxury to make mistakes.
A large aspect of my team’s business model is dependent on the mainstream acceptance of Twitter and the micro-blogging movement. When my practice-round presentation hit the slide which covers Twitter’s recent growth (see below), and why it is relevant to the long-term viability our business model, I began by stating that “our team believes that Twitter is going mainstream.”

I was quickly interrupted, and told that I was setting myself for failure. The fact that I “believe” Twitter is going mainstream, or “believe” anything for that matter, is worthless to an investor.
It was a natural slip, and looking back I realized it was meaningless to talk with emotions. The reason I said it, and why most people say it, is because it feels safe. It feels comfortable because you are floating in a balanced middle ground. When you believe or feel something, it’s an easy scapegoat if and when you are proven wrong.
Stating you “believe” something is weak strategy when pitching to investors. It’s a hedge against being wrong, which is not a stable stance if you are attempting to make a solid case for anything, especially an investment. Robert Greene talks about this in 48 Laws regarding the avoidance of being dangerously open with your emotions. He states that “it’s easy and natural to always want to talk about one’s feelings. More important, by being unabashedly open you make yourself predictable and familiar.”
Verbal hedging is a faulty hedge and opens up holes for deliberation, doubt and uncertainty from your audience. If you are pitching an idea, you better believe what you are saying is correct. If you’re not sure, then do more research or don’t bring it up. Speak in a way that portrays certainty (with data to back up it up), rather than relying on a flimsy bridge of emotion (even if it is). It adds credibility, assuming you are not completely making things up.
(Note: If you are putting together an investor pitch, this Venture Hacks slide deck tutorial was incredibly helpful. Also, if you’d like to debate the future of Twitter with me, leave a comment or email me. I’m curious to hear both sides of the argument.)
Related Essays
blog comments powered by Disqus

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b6a63edf-e67a-4302-853b-b3fe3ca26811)
Comments ( View Comments )
[...] 15, 2008 · No Comments After my post on Twitter last week, a handful of readers commented and emailed me regarding their feelings towards Twitter’s [...]
Twitter Feedback « Alex J. Mann (.com) added these pithy words on Dec 15 08 at 9:06 am[...] strategy I’ve discussed previously is called verbal hedging. The strategy I suggested, contrary to the positive positioning of the post title, was to actually [...]
The Language of Fools: Don’t Believe The Hype | alex j. mann (.com) added these pithy words on Oct 21 09 at 10:36 amAdd a Comment